Note: Although workplace inspection blitzes by the ministry are announced to the appropriate sectors in advance, individual workplaces receive no prior warning.
On January 18, 2010, the Ministry of Labour launched a 90-day provincial compliance and enforcement campaign to ensure that workplace parties were complying with the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and its regulations. Enforcement campaigns are a key part of Safe at Work Ontario. The campaigns are intended to raise awareness of known workplace hazards, improve workplace health and safety culture and promote compliance with the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) and its regulations. The overall goal is to promote a long-lasting increase in compliance and a decrease in injury and fatality rates.
The heightened enforcement campaign on fall-related hazards targeted provincially regulated construction projects, diving operations and window cleaning activities where a worker may have been exposed to a fall-related hazard. Over the course of the campaign, ministry inspectors ensured that:
This report provides an overview of compliance trends discovered during the enforcement campaign. It also recommends practical solutions to help Ontario’s construction industry achieve compliance with the fall protection requirements under the OHSA and reduce the number of traumatic fatalities and injuries due to falls.
Ontario continues to have one of the lowest lost time injury (LTI) rates in Canada’s construction industry, 1.37 LTIs per 100 employed construction workers (2008).
| Year | Canada (Federal) | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | PQ | NB | NS | PEI | NFLD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 3.60 | 6.40 | 4.30 | 6.80 | 5.70 | 1.70 | 4.40 | 1.90[1] | 2.90 | 5.40 | 4.10 |
| 2001 | 3.70 | 5.80 | 4.40 | 6.00 | 5.50 | 1.90 | 4.90 | 2.00[1] | 3.20[2] | 4.20 | 5.70 |
| 2002 | 3.50 | 5.20 | 4.30 | 6.00 | 6.10 | 1.80 | 4.60 | 1.70[1] | 3.00[2] | 3.70 | 5.20 |
| 2003 | 3.30 | 5.20 | 3.90 | 6.10 | 6.10 | 1.60 | 4.50 | 1.90[1] | 3.10[2] | 3.50 | 4.50 |
| 2004 | 3.30 | 5.40 | 3.20 | 5.00 | 5.90 | 1.80 | 4.60 | 1.80[1] | 2.70[2] | 3.20 | 3.80 |
| 2005 | 3.20 | 5.11 | 3.18 | 5.34 | 6.60 | 1.58 | 4.20 | 1.71[1] | 2.87[2] | 2.21 | 3.41 |
| 2006 | 3.10 | 5.32 | 3.20 | 4.53 | 6.88 | 1.45 | 3.78 | 1.79[1] | 2.85[2] | 1.72 | 3.04 |
| 2007 | 2.00 | 5.19 | 3.10 | 4.50 | 5.91 | 1.38 | 3.33 | 1.78[1] | 2.79[2] | 1.60 | 2.74 |
| 2008 | 2.75 | 4.78 | 2.57 | 4.08 | 5.63 | 1.37 | 3.03 | 1.85[1] | 2.49[2] | 1.24 | 2.17 |
Source: Infrastructure Health and Safety Association
| Year | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 YTD[3] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traumatic fatalities, all causes | 20 | 27 | 16 | 19 | 16 | 4 |
| Traumatic fatalities, falls | 10 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 4[4] |
| Percent of total | 50% | 30% | 31% | 53% | 63% | 100% |
Source: Occupational Health and Safety Branch, Ministry of Labour
Figure 1 shows that Ontario appears to have experienced an overall decrease in traumatic fatality rates since 2006.
| Year | All Traumatic Fatality Rates | Fall Fatality Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 5.0 | 2.52 |
| 2006 | 6.7 | 1.97 |
| 2007 | 3.9 | 1.21 |
| 2008 | 4.3 | 2.28 |
| 2009 | 3.9 | 2.44 |
Source: Occupational Health and Safety Branch, Ministry of Labour
Since 2005, Ontario’s construction industry has experienced steady improvements in critical injury rates due to falls. Overall, these rates have improved an average of 3% per year since 2005.
| Year | All Critical Injury Rates | Fall Critical Injury Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 55.0 | 32.3 |
| 2006 | 51.3 | 28.6 |
| 2007 | 47.3 | 25.2 |
| 2008 | 41.7 | 23.2 |
| 2009 | 47.7 | 20.5 |
Source: Occupational Health and Safety Branch, Ministry of Labour
Several regulations under the OHSA prescribe safe work and training requirements to address fall-related hazards in provincially regulated workplaces.
O. Reg. 213/91 prescribes the use of guardrails or fall protection systems and other safe work requirements in the event that a worker is exposed to the following fall hazards:
In addition, the Regulation requires workers who may use a fall protection system to be adequately trained and given oral and written instructions and workers’ training records to be kept and made available to Ministry of Labour inspectors upon request. The Regulation also requires fall protection systems to comply with specified standards published by the National Standards of Canada that outline technical requirements for fall protection systems.
Under O. Reg. 629/94 whenever a stage is used to lower a diver into the water and the stage may fall a distance of more than 10 feet (approximately three metres) or into or onto operating machinery or hazardous substance or object, a fall arrest system must be used. The fall arrest system must be designed in a manner that the stage will be suspended not more than five feet below the location it occupied before the fall. In addition, the stage must be constructed to prevent the occupants from falling out of the stage.
Reg. 859 prescribes the use of a fall arrest system and other safe work requirements in the event that a worker is exposed to a fall of more than three metres. It sets out duties for owners, employers, supervisors and workers who are engaged in window cleaning activities where a suspended scaffold, boatswain’s chair or similar single-point suspension equipment is to be used. The Regulation also requires an employer to establish and maintain a safety training program for workers on the use of suspended scaffolds, boatswain’s chairs or similar single-point suspension equipment. The program must include information regarding the safe use of fall arrest systems.
Reg. 856 prohibits the use or operation of a machine unless it is equipped with a roll-over protective structure and restraining device[5] that meets criteria specified in the regulation. It also mandates the use of a restraining device belt during the use or operation of a machine in order to protect the operator from injury in the event of the machine tipping or rolling over. A machine is defined as a self-propelled vehicle, operated by one or more persons who ride on or in it, that is a tractor, bulldozer, scraper, front-end loader, skidder, dumper, grader or compactor other than an asphalt compactor.
During the heightened enforcement campaign on fall-related hazards, Ministry of Labour inspectors made 7,313 field visits to 4,455 provincially regulated construction projects (including, diving operations and window cleaning activities).
Approximately 63% (2,821) of the workplaces visited during the heightened enforcement campaign were to construction projects where fall-related hazards were identified. Ministry inspectors conducted 3,912 field visits to these sites.
| Construction Projects Where Fall Hazards Were Identified (campaign activity) | |
|---|---|
| Projects Visited | 2,821 |
| Field Visits | 3,912 |
| Stop Work Orders Issued for Fall-Related Hazards[6] | 784 |
| Orders Issued for Fall-Related Hazards | 3,421 |
| Fall-Related Contraventions associated with Stop Work Orders[6] | 1120 |
| Summonses for Fall-Related Hazards | 121 |
| To Employers | 4 |
| To Supervisors | 97 |
| To Workers | 20 |
| Tickets for Fall-Related Hazards | 117 |
Source: Occupational Health and Safety Branch, Ministry of Labour, as of May 4, 2010
More than half (56%) of the orders issued during the campaign were for violations relating to missing or improper use or maintenance of guardrails, non-suspended scaffolds and fall protection systems (see Table 4). The top 4 orders reflect a lack of appropriate supervision on construction projects, as they indicate that the elements to keep workers safe were not in effect. The OHSA and it regulations require that employers and supervisors ensure that protective devices and other measures and procedures are in place for the protection of workers. Adequate supervision means that details like guardrails and other fall protection measures are in place and workers are adequately trained in hazard awareness. Eighty percent of the summonses issued for fall-related hazards were to supervisors for lack of adequate supervision (see Table 3).
| Order Description | Orders Issued | Percent of Total Orders Issued (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Guardrails | 853 | 25 |
| Non-Suspended Scaffolds | 629 | 18 |
| Fall Protection Systems | 442 | 13 |
| Worker Training and Records | 296 | 9 |
| Ladders | 294 | 9 |
| Stairs | 237 | 7 |
| Elevating Work Platforms | 101 | 3 |
| Suspended Scaffolds and Boatswains Chairs | 76 | 2 |
| Window Cleaning | 54 | 1 |
| Others[7] | 439 | 13 |
| All Orders Issued for Fall-Related Hazards | 3,421 | 100 |
Source: Occupational Health and Safety Branch, Ministry of Labour, as of May 4, 2010
Of the 2,821 field visits conducted to construction projects where fall hazards were identified, the construction sectors that were visited the most were industrial, commercial and institutional (ICI) building construction (1,578, 40%), single family housing (1,125, 29%), and apartment and multiple housing (658, 17%) (see Table 5). These sectors accounted for 86% of the field visits conducted and approximately 94% of the total fall-related orders issued during the campaign.
| Top 3 Sectors Visited | Number of Field Visits | Number of Fall-Related Orders Issued |
|---|---|---|
| ICI Building Construction | 1,578 | 1,206 |
| Industrial Construction | 203 | 125 |
| Commercial Construction | 921 | 694 |
| Institutional Construction | 454 | 387 |
| Single Family Housing | 1,125 | 1,428 |
| Apartment and Multiple Housing | 658 | 576 |
| Total for All Sectors | 3,912 | 3,421 |
Source: Occupational Health and Safety Branch, Ministry of Labour, as of May 4, 2010
| Construction Sector | Project Premises Visited | Project Premises With Fall-Related Orders | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICI Building Construction | 1124 | 508 | 45% |
| Industrial Construction | 150 | 55 | 37% |
| Commercial Construction | 657 | 299 | 45% |
| Institutional Construction | 317 | 154 | 49% |
| Single Family Housing | 796 | 491 | 62% |
| Apartments/Multifamily Housing | 456 | 212 | 46% |
Source: Occupational Health and Safety Branch, Ministry of Labour, as of May 4, 2010
The recently concluded heightened enforcement campaign on fall-related hazards in the construction sector was one of the longest and most extensive blitzes undertaken by the Ministry of Labour. Information collected from this campaign will form an important baseline to measuring the success of strategies developed to address its findings. The ministry recognizes the need for effective and practical solutions to improve compliance with fall protection requirements and reduce the number of fall-related fatalities and injuries across Ontario.
Results of the heightened enforcement campaign indicate the following:
The Ministry of Labour will work with health and safety partners such as the Provincial Labour Management Health and Safety Committee, Workplace Safety and Insurance Board and Health and Safety Association, employer associations and unions to address the findings of the heightened enforcement campaign.
In addition, the ministry believes that greater public awareness and participation is needed to ensure employers, supervisors and workers comply with occupational health and safety requirements. This includes increasing capacity to communicate and publish occupational health and safety materials in languages other than English and French in an effort to reach workers and the public in their own languages.
[ 1 ] New Brunswick has a three-day waiting period for compensation benefits, unless the employee is off for more than 5 weeks.
[ 2 ] Nova Scotia has a two-day waiting period for compensation benefits, unless the employee is off for more than 4 weeks. For all other jurisdictions, compensations benefits are payable starting the day after the injury.
[ 3 ] Source MOL, as of May 5, 2010
[ 4 ] Preliminary information regarding one of the fatalities indicates the cause of death was due to a fall from height. Total may change subject to confirmation from the Office of the Chief Coroner.
[ 5 ] A “restraining device” means a seat belt with or without an over-the-shoulder strap under Reg. 856.